Program - ACITA 2008 - Imperial College London SW7 2AZ. UK
| Event Overview | Technical Programme | Workshop Programme | Demos | Innovation Discussion |
The registration desk will be in building 21 (Sherfield Building) as marked on the campus map. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/campusinfo/southkensington
Download full programme as PDF file

|
Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12.30 |
Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12:00 |
Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12:30 |
|
Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30 |
Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30 |
Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30 |
|
Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15 |
Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15 |
Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15 |
|
Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00 |
Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00 |
Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00 |
| Page 10 |
P. Smart, D. Mott, E. Gentle, D. Braines, W. Sieck, S. Poltrock, P. Houghton, C. Giammanco, A. Preece, M. Nixon, M. Strub, D. Roberts, D. Verma and N. Shadbolt, “Holistan Revisted: Demonstrating Knowledge-Based Capabilities for Coalition Military Operations using the ITA Holistan Scenario” |
| Page 18 | A. Preece, M. Jackson, G. Pearson and T. Pham, “Sensor-Mission Assignment: A Scenario-Driven Walkthrough” |
| Page 25 | D. Verma, T. Brown, L. Kaplan, A. Bar-Noy and M. Nixon “The Green Zone Protection Problem” |
| Page 31 | M. Johnson, H. Rowaihy, D. Pizzocaro, A. Bar-Noy, S. Chalmers, T. La Porta and A. Preece, “Frugal Sensor Assignment” |
| Page 39 | R. Gennaro, S. Halevi, H. Krawczyk and T. Rabin, “Threshold RSA for Dynamic and Ad-Hoc Groups” |
| Page 47 | S. Balfe, K. G. Paterson, P. Rohatgi and M. Srivatsa, “Securing Information Flows With Trust-based Encryption” |
| Page 54 | M. Srivatsa, P. Rohatgi, S. Balfe and K. Patterson, “An Economic Model for Securing Cross-Domain Information Flows” |
| Page 62 | V. Manfredi, R. Hancock and J. Kurose, “Robust Routing in Dynamic MANETs” |
| Page 70 | E. Bulut, Z. Wang and B. K. Szymanski, “Minimizing Average Spraying Cost for Routing in Delay Tolerant Networks” |
| Page 78 | C.K. Chau, J. Crowcroft, K.W. Lee and S. H. Y. Wong, “Inter-Domain Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks” |
| Page 85 | H. Zhao, C.K. Chau and S. M. Bellovin, “ROFL: Routing as the Firewall Layer” |
| Page 93 | J. A. Allen, D. Mott, A. Bahrami, J. Yuan, C. Giammanco and J. Patel, “A Framework for Supporting Human Military Planning” |
| Page 100 | C. Burnett, D. Masato, M. McCallum, T. J. Norman; J. Giampapa, M. J. Kollingbaum and K. Sycara, “Agent Support for Mission Planning Under Policy Constraints” |
| Page 108 | A. Bahrami, J. Yuan, D. Mott. C. D. Emele, D. Masato and T. J. Norman, “Collaborative, Context-Aware and Chain of Command Sensitive Planning” |
| Page 115 | D. Verma, B.J. Ko, P. Zerfos, K.W. Lee, M. Duggan, K. Stewart, B. Rivera and A. Swami, “Understanding Quality of Management in Computer Networks” |
| Page 123 | A. D. McDonald, J. Crowcroft and M. Srivatsa, “Security across Disparate Management Domains in MANETs” |
| Page 131 | Y.E. Lu, F. Wicker, Y.C. Chen, P Li and D. Towsley, “On Secure Network Structures in the Lakehurst Trace” |
| Page 138 | K.W. Lee, V. Pappas and A. Tantawi, C. K. Chau “Enabling Accurate Node Control in Randomized Duty Cycling Networks” |
| Page 146 | Y. Alayev, A. Bar-Noy and T. F. La Porta, “Energy Conservation vs. Efficiency in Info-Page Broadcasting to Sensors” |
| Page 152 | P. Basu and C.K. Chau, “Opportunistic Forwarding in Wireless Networks with Duty Cycling” |
| Page 160 | S. Parsons, S. Poltrock, H. Bowyer and Y. Tang, “Analysis of a Recorded Team Coordination Dialogue” |
| Page 167 | S. Poteet, J. Patel, C. Giammanco; I. Whiteley, P. Xue and A. Kao, “Words Are Mightier Than Swords ... and Yet Miscommunication Costs Lives!” |
| Page 174 | Y. Tang, T. J. Norman and S. Parsons, “Agent-based Dialogues to Support Plan Execution by Human Teams” |
| Page 182 | S. Zahedi, M. B. Srivastava and C. Bisdikian, “A Framework for Quality of Information Analysis for Detection-oriented Sensor Network Deployments” |
| Page 190 | B. Guo, M. S. Nixon and T. Damarla, “Acoustic Information Fusion for Ground Vehicle Classification” |
| Page 197 | D. Gillies, D. J. Thornley and C. Bisdikian, “Using Probabilistic Inference to Estimate the Quality of Information in Military Sensor Networks |
| Page 203 | Z. Ding, K. K. Leung, D. L. Goeckel and D. Towsley, “A Novel Relay Assisted Cooperative Transmission Protocol for Wireless Multiple Access Systems” |
| Page 209 | K. Hardwick, D. Goeckel, D. Towsley, K. Leung and Z. Ding, “Antenna Beam Pattern Model for Cooperative Ad-Hoc Networks” |
| Page 217 | Z. Ding and K. K. Leung, “On the Design of Opportunistic Decode-Forward Cooperative Transmission Protocol” |
| Page 223 | D. Braines, Y. Kalfoglou, P. Smart, J. Bao, N. Shadbolt and J. Hendler, “Semantic Web techniques to support Interoperability in Distributed Network Environments” |
| Page 231 | S. E. Poltrock, M. Handel, H. Bowyer and P. Waggett, “A Dynamic Model of Mission Context” |
| Page 238 | G. Bent, P. Dantressangle, D. Vyvyan, A. Mowshowitz and V. Mitsou, “A Dynamic Distributed Federated Database” |
| Page 245 | J. Karat, W. Sieck, T. J. Norman, C.M. Karat, C. Brodie, L. Rasmussen and K. Sycara, “A Framework for Culturally Adaptive Policy Management in Ad Hoc Collaborative Contexts” |
| Page 253 | Y. T. Lim, P. C. Cheng, J. A. Clark and P. Rohatgi, “Policy Evolution with Grammatical Evolution” |
| Page 261 | A. Schaeffer-Filho, E. Lupu, M. Sloman, S.L. Keoh, J. Lobo and S. Calo, “A Role-based Infrastructure for the Management of Dynamic Communities” |
| Page 269 | B. Liu, D. Towsley and A. Swami, “On the data gathering capacity of large scale multihop wireless networks” |
| Page 276 | R. Khalili, D. L. Goeckel, E. Jones, A Swami and D. Towsley, “Neighbor discovery with reception status feedback” |
| Page 283 | M. Beigi, S.F. Chang, D. C. Verma and S. Ebadollahi, “Unsupervised Multi-Scale Salient Temporal Outlier Detection” |
|
Room 307 |
Room 208 |
Room 141 |
Room 207 |
|
| 09 - 10 | Practical Semantic Integration | Themes, Scenarios, and Military Context | Sensor Fabric and Data Management | |
| 10 - 11 | ||||
| 11 - 12 | ||||
| 12 - 01 | Break (Sherfield Building) | |||
| 01 - 02 | QoI / QoS | Military Planning: concepts, process and tools | Urban Sensing | |
| 02 - 03 | Doctoral Symposium |
|||
| 03 - 04 | ||||
| 04 - 05 | ||||
| 05 - 06 | ||||
| 06 - 07 | Buffet (Sherfield Building) | |||
| 07 - 08 | ||||
| Organisers | Title | Description |
Erol Gelenbe Mani Srivastava Boleslaw Szymanski |
QoS and QoI in Sensor Networks |
The Quality of Information (QoI) offered by sensor networks is a relatively new topic of research and it is central to military applications. On the other hand, Quality of Service (QoS) is a classical topic of investigation in the field of communications, and it has received renewed attention in the context of sensor networks. This session will address recent research of military relevance about the interaction of QoS and QoI, and in particular will examine the role of traffic load, routing, and sensor reliability as it affects both QoS and QoI as well how the trade-off between reliability, load balance and communication delay impact optimal QoS and therefore QoI. Composed of four to six papers , this session will discuss how adaptive on-line distributed control of QoS can be used to improve QoI. We will examine how congestion in the network can affect QoI in the context of critical applications such as tracking of targets in a sensory field. We will also consider how traffic generated in relation to sensor failures, unusual events of military interest, and routine data about the ongoing status of a sensory field, can be dynamically managed in order to provide the best possible value of QoI. The session will stress the cross-Atlantic collaborative activities, as well as the industry-university collaborations, which have been carried out in the US/UK ITA. |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
|
Helen Bowyer, IBM UK Ltd John Ibbotson, IBM UK Ltd Gavin Pearson, Dstl Brian Rivera, Army Research Labs Dave Sloggett, representing Logica |
Themes, Scenarios, and Military Context |
The ITA research programme is aiming to make substantial contributions to the area of network science during its initial 5 year period. For the contributions to be relevant to future technology deployed by its military sponsors, the research must be grounded in current and future military doctrine and tested within scenarios based on realistic military operations. The purpose of this workshop is to inform the attendees of the contextual background to the ITA programme, the use of scenarios to provide a realistic environment in which to evaluate the research and the simulation of the scenarios using multi-player games technology. The workshop will be of benefit to researchers from all technical areas within the ITA and others who have an interest in the background to the ITA programme. It will take the form of presentations and demonstrations with time allocated for questions and discussion. The provisional programme will be: 09:00 – 09:45 The ITA Military Context, Dave Sloggett |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
|
Christopher Gibson Flavio Bergamaschi |
Sensor Fabric and Data Management |
The diverse set of asset types and networking technologies commonly used in fielded sensor networks provide a unique set of challenges in the areas of sensor identification, interoperability, and sensor data consumability. The ITA Sensor Fabric is a middleware infrastructure – developed as part of Technical Area 3, Project 8 – that addresses these challenges by providing unified access to, and management of, sensor networks. It facilitates universal access to intelligence and sensor data from any point on the Fabric, maximizing its availability and utility to mission planning services, analysis applications (including fusion algorithms and agents), human analysts, and mobile forces. In addition to its use with fielded sensor networks, the Fabric can also be used as a research tool that facilitates bringing together many areas of ITA. Its plug-in architecture (ideal for testing new algorithms), sensor data record and playback capability, sensor simulation, and performance measurement, make it an ideal platform for performing repeatable experiments in an environment that has a high degree of fidelity with fielded systems. This tutorial will provide an opportunity to learn about: - Installation and configuration of the Fabric Many ITA technologies, techniques, and algorithms can be integrated with the Fabric providing significant opportunities for experimentation, evaluation, and an accelerated route to use in the field. Notable successes have already been achieved with ARL (deployment of the Fabric for field trial data capture), the University of Aberdeen (sensor/mission matching), and Project 4 (policy). As such this event will benefit: researchers developing new algorithms (from all Technical Areas and Projects); researchers wishing to test algorithms with fielded sensor networks; users and developers of fielded sensor networks; and all those interested in sensor network middleware platforms. The Sensor Fabric tutorial will be structured as a lecture from the Fabric’s developers (Christopher Gibson and Flavio Bergamaschi), and will span introductory material through to code examples. |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
|
David Braines Paul Smart |
Practical semantic integration |
We will define semantic integration, explain why it is useful, differentiate it from other (non-semantic) techniques for integration and then go on to give a practical demonstration of semantic integration using easily available data sources, common semantic web tools and techniques, and showcase the usage of some of the Semantic Web based techniques for alignment and interoperability that have come out of ITA research in this area. Our specific focus will be one integration of existing data sources and existing instance data, largely from small lightweight ontologies. We will not be focusing on the more traditional "model based" alignment and mapping concerns that are usually associated with large scale ontologies although we will briefly mention these in order to contrast our approach. Attendees should have a basic understanding of data integration or semantic integration concepts, and ideally a basic understand of Semantic Web technologies although this is not mandatory as we will be introducing these technologies at the beginning of the workshop. Semantic integration is primarily of interest to researchers in the areas of distributed coalition planning and decision making, although semantic integration techniques are also relevant to issues in the sensor information processing and delivery domain and in some cases to security and policy management. Semantic integration is a powerful and useful core component to be used when dealing with multiple disparate systems and distributed data in heterogeneous formats, situations that are commonplace to most ITA research concerns. This workshop is comprised on a series of presentations introducing the domain, showcasing example techniques and approaches, and will be concluded with a 30 minute discussion between the speakers, invited guests and attendees |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
|
Jitu Patel Maj Ed Gentle David Mott |
Military Planning: concepts, process and tools |
Planning is one of the key military functions. It is directed by the 1) overview of the military planning process including a short exercise which will help students better understand the intricacies of the process. 2) an outline of extant planning support tools and their usefulness, lessons from recent operations, issues that need to be addressed. 3) an introduction to CPM (which addresses one of the key issues and is currently being research in P12), a demo of the CPM visualiser. The session will end with a discussion of the way forward. |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
Mani Srivastava Mario Gerla Bolek Szymanski Kin Leung Kang-won Lee Trevor Ellis (Transport for London (TfL)) Jon Crowcroft (Cambridge) |
Urban Sensing |
The aim of this workshop is to discuss challenges and present on-going research in network architecture and services for military operations and homeland defense applications in urban spaces. A traditional approach for such sensing is to instrument physical spaces with embedded sensors to monitor physical and human activities, which is often insufficient in uncertain urban sensing environments. Embedding sufficient sensing resources across neighborhoods and cities is simply too costly, requires broad deployments that are likely to be either aesthetically or politically unacceptable; and, ultimately prove to be inflexible in the face of diverse missions, unknown coverage requirements, and sensing uncertainties. An alternative vision of sensing in urban spaces has begun to emerge based on sensing by the public itself. Termed as Participatory Sensing, this entails exploiting for sensing the natural mobility of people through and between spaces they live, work, and commute in. Such a system can coordinate data capture by people using sensors embedded in their vehicles as well as cell phones that are already equipped with acoustic, image, and location sensors (and have Bluetooth interface to which external sensors can be connected). Cell phones can be valuable tools for people to contribute human intelligence as they provide text and graphics entry for the manual description and annotation of events observed by people during the course of their daily lives. Sensors embedded in vehicles offer complementary advantages of fewer constraints on the processing, sensing, and communication platform. This workshop will address recent research in participatory sensing in creating network services, models, and protocols for realizing this vision of turning the vehicles and cell phones in an urban space into a fluid substrate for hosting widespread but coordinated participatory sensing of urban spaces. |
| Organisers | Title | Description |
|
Diego Pizzocaro Daniele Masato Nikoletta Sofra Konrad Borowiecki David Emele Chukwuemeka Chris Burnett Hosam Rowaihy |
Doctoral Symposium |
Workshop aim Event benefits Organization 1. First session (45 minutes): a keynote held by John Ibbotson, one of the relevant figures in the ITA. John Ibbotson is a Senior Member and Master Inventor at IBM UK, as well as Project Champion for Project 13. He is also pursuing a PhD at Southampton University (UK). As Project 13 Champion, he will give the students an overview of the Project, followed by some insight on his career in Industry and his PhD development. 2. Second session (60 minutes): a panel of three/four experts from Academia,Industry and the Military that will focus on the topic ‚"How to choose a careerpath?". Given the unique structure of the ITA, it will be possible to highlightthe differences between Academia, Industry and Government careers.Confirmed panelists at the moment are John Ibbotson, Tien Pham (Army Research Laboratory, US), Jon Crowcroft (University of Cambridge, UK) andMike Strub (Army Research Laboratory, US & Defense Science andTechnology Laboratory, UK): The panel discussion could start with a brief introduction from the panelists about their role within the Project and the institution they work for. To follow,the discussion would touch on topics as what makes such institution/role stimulating, and and what is its impact on the field, or on science. Other interesting subjects may be what skills and abilities a student would requireto pursue a career in the field/institution in which the panelists are involved and how easy would be to get an interview. Also, what are the expectationsof the institution from its employee and what gratifications could a candidate benefit of by working in that particular field. 3. Third session (90 minutes): a set of 6 talks (15 minutes each) given by PhD students in which they will present an overview of their research work. Presenters will be able to receive feedback from their peers and from the expert panel; at the same time the student audience will understand the methodologies and approaches used by their peers facing the typical challenges of pursuing a PhD (e.g. formulating working hypothesis, doing literature review, evaluating results, etc.). The attendance to the Doctoral Symposium is FREE for all ITA PhD Students,on the condition that it must be the only workshop they are attending. Payment of the workshop fee is required if students plan to attend any other workshop on thesame day. |
|
Title |
Leader |
| Inter-domain routing for MANETs | Kang-Won Lee, IBM US |
| ITA Integrative 'Fabric and GaianDB enabled sensor network | David Vyvyan, IBM UK |
| Quality of Information an Empirical Approach | Laurence Hey, Imperial College |
| End-to-End Sensor-Mission Assignment | Alun Preece, Cardiff |
| Coalition Security Policy Manager Portal | Clare-Marie Karat, IBM US |
| Scenarios Experiments and Context Models using BattleField2 | Helen Bowyer, IBM UK |
| Policy-Based management in Dynamic Communities | Anandha Gopalan, Imperial College |
| Semantic Integration in the Holistan vignette | Dave Braines, IBM UK |
| Automatic Transformation of IPSEC Security Policies to Device Configurations | Kirk Schloegel, Honeywell |
The End of the Endless Frontier? Innovation and Transition in the 21st Century
Full details for this Innovation discussion can be found here.
Panelists
Jim Hendler, Tetherless World Senior Constellation Chair, Rensselaer polytechnic Institute (moderator)
Mark Wegman, Head of Computer Science, IBM Research
John Parmentola, Director for Research and Laboratory Management, US Army
David Gann, Chair in Technology and Innovation Management, Imperial
Nigel Chew, Deputy Director Defence Technology and Innovation Centre, MoD
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| final programme.jpg | 95.99 KB |
| ACITAProgramme.pdf | 1.4 MB |
