Program - ACITA 2008 - Imperial College London SW7 2AZ. UK

ACITA-2008_logo

Event Overview  Technical Programme Workshop Programme Demos Innovation Discussion

The registration desk will be in building 21 (Sherfield Building) as marked on the campus map. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/campusinfo/southkensington

Download full programme as PDF file

 

event overview

Technical Programme (Sherfield Building)

Session 1.1

Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12.30
Chair: Steven McCann

Session 1.2

Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12:00
Chair: Tom McCutcheon

Session 1.3

 Wed 17th Sep 10:30 - 12:30
Chair: Katia Sycara

Session 2.1

Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30
Chair: Steven Poltrock

Session 2.2

Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30
Chair: Kin Leung

Session 2.3

Wed 17th Sep 14:00 - 15:30
Chair: Boleslaw Szymanski

Session 3.1

Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15
Chair: Ian Whitworth

Session 3.2

Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15
Chair: John Ibbotson

Session 3.3

Wed 17th Sep 15:45 - 17:15
Chair: Jon Crowcroft

Session 4.1

Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00
Chair: Dave Sloggett

Session 4.2

Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00
Chair: Kenny Paterson

Session 4.3

Thu 18th Sep 10:30 - 12:00
Chair: Steve Bellovin

Papers

Session 1.1 (Wed 17th Sept, 10:30-12:30; chair: Steven McCann)
Page 10

P. Smart, D. Mott, E. Gentle, D. Braines, W. Sieck, S. Poltrock, P. Houghton, C. Giammanco, A. Preece, M. Nixon, M. Strub, D. Roberts, D. Verma and N. Shadbolt, “Holistan Revisted: Demonstrating Knowledge-Based Capabilities for Coalition Military Operations using the ITA Holistan Scenario

Page 18 A. Preece, M. Jackson, G. Pearson and T. Pham, “Sensor-Mission Assignment: A Scenario-Driven Walkthrough
Page 25 D. Verma, T. Brown, L. Kaplan, A. Bar-Noy and M. Nixon “The Green Zone Protection Problem
Page 31 M. Johnson, H. Rowaihy, D. Pizzocaro, A. Bar-Noy, S. Chalmers, T. La Porta and A. Preece, “Frugal Sensor Assignment
Session 1.2 (Wed 17th Sept, 10:30-12:00; chair: Tom McCutcheon)
Page 39 R. Gennaro, S. Halevi, H. Krawczyk and T. Rabin, “Threshold RSA for Dynamic and Ad-Hoc Groups
Page 47 S. Balfe, K. G. Paterson, P. Rohatgi and M. Srivatsa, “Securing Information Flows With Trust-based Encryption
Page 54 M. Srivatsa, P. Rohatgi, S. Balfe and K. Patterson, “An Economic Model for Securing Cross-Domain Information Flows
Session 1.3 (Wed 17th Sept, 10:30-12:30; chair: Katia Sycara)
Page 62 V. Manfredi, R. Hancock and J. Kurose, “Robust Routing in Dynamic MANETs
Page 70 E. Bulut, Z. Wang and B. K. Szymanski, “Minimizing Average Spraying Cost for Routing in Delay Tolerant Networks
Page 78 C.K. Chau, J. Crowcroft, K.W. Lee and S. H. Y. Wong, “Inter-Domain Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Page 85  H. Zhao, C.K. Chau and S. M. Bellovin, “ROFL: Routing as the Firewall Layer
Session 2.1 (Wed 17th Sept, 14:00-15:30; chair: Steven Poltrock)
Page 93 J. A. Allen, D. Mott, A. Bahrami, J. Yuan, C. Giammanco and J. Patel, “A Framework for Supporting Human Military Planning
Page 100 C. Burnett, D. Masato, M. McCallum, T. J. Norman; J. Giampapa, M. J. Kollingbaum and K. Sycara, “Agent Support for Mission Planning Under Policy Constraints
Page 108 A. Bahrami, J. Yuan, D. Mott. C. D. Emele, D. Masato and T. J. Norman, “Collaborative, Context-Aware and Chain of Command Sensitive Planning
Session 2.2 (Wed 17th Sept, 14:00-15:30; chair: Kin Leung)
Page 115 D. Verma, B.J. Ko, P. Zerfos, K.W. Lee, M. Duggan, K. Stewart, B. Rivera and A. Swami, “Understanding Quality of Management in Computer Networks
Page 123 A. D. McDonald, J. Crowcroft and M. Srivatsa, “Security across Disparate Management Domains in MANETs
Page 131 Y.E. Lu, F. Wicker, Y.C. Chen, P Li and D. Towsley, “On Secure Network Structures in the Lakehurst Trace
Session 2.3 (Wed 17th Sept, 14:00-15:30; chair: Boleslaw Szymanski)
Page 138  K.W. Lee, V. Pappas and A. Tantawi, C. K. Chau “Enabling Accurate Node Control in Randomized Duty Cycling Networks
Page 146 Y. Alayev, A. Bar-Noy and T. F. La Porta, “Energy Conservation vs. Efficiency in Info-Page Broadcasting to Sensors
Page 152 P. Basu and C.K. Chau, “Opportunistic Forwarding in Wireless Networks with Duty Cycling
Session 3.1 (Wed 17th Sept, 15:45-17:15; chair: Ian Whitworth)
Page 160 S. Parsons, S. Poltrock, H. Bowyer and Y. Tang, “Analysis of a Recorded Team Coordination Dialogue
Page 167 S. Poteet, J. Patel, C. Giammanco; I. Whiteley, P. Xue and A. Kao, “Words Are Mightier Than Swords ... and Yet Miscommunication Costs Lives!
Page 174 Y. Tang, T. J. Norman and S. Parsons, “Agent-based Dialogues to Support Plan Execution by Human Teams
Session 3.2 (Wed 17th Sept, 15:45-17:15; chair: John Ibbotson)
Page 182 S. Zahedi, M. B. Srivastava and C. Bisdikian, “A Framework for Quality of Information Analysis for Detection-oriented Sensor Network Deployments
Page 190 B. Guo, M. S. Nixon and T. Damarla, “Acoustic Information Fusion for Ground Vehicle Classification
Page 197 D. Gillies, D. J. Thornley and C. Bisdikian, “Using Probabilistic Inference to Estimate the Quality of Information in Military Sensor Networks
Session 3.3 (Wed 17th Sept, 15:45-17:15; chair: Jon Crowcroft)
Page 203 Z. Ding, K. K. Leung, D. L. Goeckel and D. Towsley, “A Novel Relay Assisted Cooperative Transmission Protocol for Wireless Multiple Access Systems
Page 209 K. Hardwick, D. Goeckel, D. Towsley, K. Leung and Z. Ding, “Antenna Beam Pattern Model for Cooperative Ad-Hoc Networks
Page 217 Z. Ding and K. K. Leung, “On the Design of Opportunistic Decode-Forward Cooperative Transmission Protocol
Session 4.1 (Thu 18th Sept, 10:30-12:00; chair: Dave Sloggett)
Page 223 D. Braines, Y. Kalfoglou, P. Smart, J. Bao, N. Shadbolt and J. Hendler, “Semantic Web techniques to support Interoperability in Distributed Network Environments
Page 231 S. E. Poltrock, M. Handel, H. Bowyer and P. Waggett, “A Dynamic Model of Mission Context
Page 238 G. Bent, P. Dantressangle, D. Vyvyan, A. Mowshowitz and V. Mitsou, “A Dynamic Distributed Federated Database
Session 4.2 (Thu 18th Sept, 10:30-12:00; chair: Kenny Paterson)
Page 245 J. Karat, W. Sieck, T. J. Norman, C.M. Karat, C. Brodie, L. Rasmussen and K. Sycara, “A Framework for Culturally Adaptive Policy Management in Ad Hoc Collaborative Contexts
Page 253 Y. T. Lim, P. C. Cheng, J. A. Clark and P. Rohatgi, “Policy Evolution with Grammatical Evolution
Page 261 A. Schaeffer-Filho, E. Lupu, M. Sloman, S.L. Keoh, J. Lobo and S. Calo, “A Role-based Infrastructure for the Management of Dynamic Communities
Session 4.3 (Thu 18th Sept, 10:30-12:00; chair: Steve Bellovin)
Page 269 B. Liu, D. Towsley and A. Swami, “On the data gathering capacity of large scale multihop wireless networks
Page 276 R. Khalili, D. L. Goeckel, E. Jones, A Swami and D. Towsley, “Neighbor discovery with reception status feedback
Page 283 M. Beigi, S.F. Chang, D. C. Verma and S. Ebadollahi, “Unsupervised Multi-Scale Salient Temporal Outlier Detection
Posters
Page 292 Y. Hou, K. K. Leung, A. Misra and T. La Porta “Mission-Based Joint Adaptation of Data Rates and Transmission Power for Multicast Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 294 M. Szczodrak, S. Zahedi, P. Ji, D. Mylaraswamy, M. Srivastava and R. Young, “Simulation Framework for QoI Characterization of Sensor Networks in the Presence of Faults”
Page 296 A. Fujimura, S. Y. Oh and M. Gerla, “Network Coding vs. Erasure Coding: Reliable Multicast in Ad hoc Networks
Page 298 E. Gelenbe and L. Hey, “Experimental Insights into Quality of Information
Page 300 C. M. Lee, V. Pappas, S. Sahu and S. Seshan, “Impact of Coverage on the Performance of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
Page 302 L. Yu and A Ephremides, “Improved Energy Efficiency in Sensor Network based Data Fusion for Hypothesis Testing
Page 304 V. Pappas; D. Verma, A. Swami, B. Rivera and Y.E. Lu, “A Biologically Inspired Architecture for a Self Organizing Computing Network
Page 306 Z. Wang, E. Bulut and B. K. Szymanski, “Distributed Target Tracking with Imperfect Binary Sensor Networks
Page 308 Z. Sheng, Z. Ding, K. K. Leung, D. L. Goeckel and D. Towsley, “Error Performance Bounds for Routing Algorithms in Wireless Cooperative Networks
Page 310 Y. Alayev, A. Bar Noy, F. Chen, I. Fermin, T. La Porta, G. Pearson and T. Pham, “A System Architecture for Filtering and Disseminating Data in Sensors Networks
Page 312 P. Basu, A. Medina, O. Pikalo and C. Santivanez, “Universal Mobility Modeling for MANETS
Page 314 S. Eswaran, A. Misra and T. La Porta, “Utility-Based Adaptation in Mission-oriented Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 316 S. Zahedi, M. Szczodrak, P. Ji, D. Mylaraswamy, M. Srivastava and R. Young, “Two-Tier Framework for Sensor Fault Characterization in Sensor Networks
Page 318 T. He, M. Zafer and C. Bisdikian, “Detecting Transient Signals with Incomplete Observations: Performance Analysis
Page 320 X. Lu, Y.C. Chen, P. Liò and D. Towsley, “Modeling Mobility from Military MANET Traces
Page 322 S. Reidt and S. D. Wolthusen, “Exploiting UAVs’ Capabilities in Tactical MANETS
Page 324 M. Strub and J. Patel, “The time has come…
Page 326 D. Pizzocaro, M. P. Johnson, H. Rowaihy, S. Chalmers, A. D. Preece, A. Bar-Noy and T. La Porta, “Maximizing Utility of Sensor-Mission Assignment with Uncertain Demands
Page 328 A. J. Ford and J. Crowcroft, “Applying Policy to Inter-domain MANET Routing in Challenging Environments
Page 330 N. Sofra, T. He, P. Zerfos, B. J. Ko, K.W. Lee and K. K. Leung, “Accuracy Analysis of Data Aggregation for Network Monitoring
Page 332 D. Towsley and A. Twigg, “Rate-optimal decentralized broadcasting: the wireless case
Page 334 A. J. Ford, S. H. Y. Wong and C.K. Chau, “Inter- and Intra-Domain Routing Interactions for MANETs
Page 336 A. Schaeffer-Filho, E. Lupu, M. Sloman, J. Lobo and S. Calo, “Engineering Abstractions for Modelling Interactions between Self-Managed Cells
Page 338 E. Jones, “Framing the Problem of Creating Ad-Hoc Distributed Antenna Arrays for Cluster Communications
Page 340 Z. Ding, K. K. Leung, D. L. Goeckel and D. Towsley, “A New Form of Network Coded Cooperative Transmission for Multiple Access Channels
Page 342 D. Mott and C. Giammanco, “The Use of Rationale in Collaborative Planning
Page 344 K. Ariyur, T. Schmid, Y. Yi, Z. Charbiwala and M. B. Srivastava, “On the Impact of Time Synchronization on Quality of Information and Network Performance
Page 346 D. C. Verma, C. W. Wu, T. Brown, A. Bar-Noy, S. Shamoun and M. Nixon, “Location Dependent Heuristics for Sensor Coverage Planning
Page 348 E. Gelenbe and E. C.H. Ngai, “Adaptive Random Re-Routing in Sensor Networks
Page 350 S. Balfe and S. Reidt, “Key Deactivation Strategies in MANETs Extended Abstract
Page 352 J. R. Rabaiotti, H. Chivers, J. A. Clark, P.C. Cheng, N. Ivanic and S. Balfe, “Reputation Attacks in Mediated and Automated Systems
Page 354 P.C. Cheng and P. Rohatgi, “IT Security as Risk Management: A Research Perspective
Page 356 M. Zafer, B. Ko and I. W.H. Ho, “Multi-Monitor Estimation of Transmit Power under Wireless Fading
Page 358 Emma Jones, “Creation of a Cooperative Beam Formed Antenna System within a Cluster
Page 360 A. Mowshowitz, V. Mitsou and G. Bent, “Models of Network Growth by Combination
Page 362 G. Tichogiorgos, K. K. Leung, A. Misra and T. La Porta, “Distributed Network Utility Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Power Control
Page 364  P. Ji and M. Szczodrak, “A Multivariate Model for Data Cleansing in Sensor Networks
Page 366 S. C. Geyik and B. K. Szymanski, “A Grammar Inference Algorithm for Event Recognition in Sensor Networks
Page 368  E. Bulut, J. Zheng, Z. Wang and B. K. Szymanski, “Analysis of Cost-Quality Tradeoff in Cooperative Ad Hoc Sensor Networks
Page 370  A. J. Ford, “A Semantic Routing Framework
Page 372 D. J. Thornley, R. I. Young and J. P. Richardson, “From mission specification to quality of information measures–closing the loop in military sensor networks
Page 374 E. Jones, “An Ad-Hoc Network Architecture Utilising Cryptography to Provide Multi-Service and Coalition Interoperability
Workshops (Tue 16th Sept) Skempton Building
 

 Room 307

 Room 208

 Room 141

 Room 207

 09 - 10  Practical Semantic Integration Themes, Scenarios, and Military Context Sensor Fabric and Data Management  
 10 - 11
 11 - 12
 12 - 01  Break (Sherfield Building)
 01 - 02 QoI / QoS  Military Planning: concepts, process and tools  Urban Sensing  
 02 - 03 Doctoral Symposium
 03 - 04
 04 - 05      
 05 - 06      
 06 - 07  Buffet (Sherfield Building)
 07 - 08
QoI / QoS
Organisers  Title  Description

Erol Gelenbe

Mani Srivastava

Boleslaw Szymanski


QoS and QoI in Sensor Networks

 

The Quality of Information (QoI) offered by sensor networks is a relatively new topic of research and it is central to military applications. On the other hand, Quality of Service (QoS) is a classical topic of investigation in the field of communications, and it has received renewed attention in the context of sensor networks.

This session will address recent research of military relevance about the interaction of QoS and QoI, and in particular will examine the role of traffic load, routing, and sensor reliability as it affects both QoS and QoI as well how the trade-off between reliability, load balance and communication delay impact optimal QoS and therefore QoI.

Composed of four to six papers , this session will discuss how adaptive on-line distributed control  of QoS can be used to improve QoI. We will examine how congestion in the network can affect QoI in the context of critical applications such as tracking of targets in a sensory field. We will also consider how traffic generated in relation to sensor failures, unusual events of military interest, and routine data about  the ongoing status of a sensory field, can be dynamically managed in order to provide the best possible value of QoI. The session will stress the cross-Atlantic collaborative activities, as well as the industry-university collaborations, which have been carried out in the US/UK ITA.

Themes, Scenarios, and Military Context
Organisers  Title  Description

Helen Bowyer, IBM UK Ltd

John Ibbotson, IBM UK Ltd

Gavin Pearson, Dstl

Brian Rivera, Army Research Labs

Dave Sloggett, representing Logica


Themes, Scenarios, and Military Context


The ITA research programme is aiming to make substantial contributions to the area of network science during its initial 5 year period. For the contributions to be relevant to future technology deployed by its military sponsors, the research must be grounded in current and future military doctrine and tested within scenarios based on realistic military operations. The purpose of this workshop is to inform the attendees of the contextual background to the ITA programme, the use of scenarios to provide a realistic environment in which to evaluate the research and the simulation of the scenarios using multi-player games technology.

The workshop will be of benefit to researchers from all technical areas within the ITA and others who have an interest in the background to the ITA programme. It will take the form of presentations and demonstrations with time allocated for questions and discussion. The provisional programme will be:

09:00 – 09:45 The ITA Military Context, Dave Sloggett
09:45 – 10:00 Q&A
10:00 – 10:45 The ITA Scenarios, Gavin Pearson and Brian Rivera
10:45 – 11:00 Q&A
11:00 – 11:45 Simulating ITA Scenarios using Battlefield 2, Helen Bowyer
11:45 – 12:00 Q&A

Sensor Fabric and Data Management 
Organisers  Title  Description

Christopher Gibson

Flavio Bergamaschi


Sensor Fabric and Data Management


The diverse set of asset types and networking technologies commonly used in fielded sensor networks provide a unique set of challenges in the areas of sensor identification, interoperability, and sensor data consumability. The ITA Sensor Fabric is a middleware infrastructure – developed as part of Technical Area 3, Project 8 – that addresses these challenges by providing unified access to, and management of, sensor networks. It facilitates universal access to intelligence and sensor data from any point on the Fabric, maximizing its availability and utility to mission planning services, analysis applications (including fusion algorithms and agents), human analysts, and mobile forces.

In addition to its use with fielded sensor networks, the Fabric can also be used as a research tool that facilitates bringing together many areas of ITA. Its plug-in architecture (ideal for testing new algorithms), sensor data record and playback capability, sensor simulation, and performance measurement, make it an ideal platform for performing repeatable experiments in an environment that has a high degree of fidelity with fielded systems.

This tutorial will provide an opportunity to learn about:

-    Installation and configuration of the Fabric
-    The distributed Fabric Registry
-    Development and testing of algorithms
-    Deployment in a sensor network, and the integration of new sensors
-    Sensor data recording and playback
-    Extending the capabilities of the Fabric
-    Fabric instrumentation and performance measurement
-    The Fabric and policy

Many ITA technologies, techniques, and algorithms can be integrated with the Fabric providing significant opportunities for experimentation, evaluation, and an accelerated route to use in the field. Notable successes have already been achieved with ARL (deployment of the Fabric for field trial data capture), the University of Aberdeen (sensor/mission matching), and Project 4 (policy). As such this event will benefit: researchers developing new algorithms (from all Technical Areas and Projects); researchers wishing to test algorithms with fielded sensor networks; users and developers of fielded sensor networks; and all those interested in sensor network middleware platforms.

The Sensor Fabric tutorial will be structured as a lecture from the Fabric’s developers (Christopher Gibson and Flavio Bergamaschi), and will span introductory material through to code examples.

Practical Semantic Integration
Organisers  Title Description

David Braines

Paul Smart

Practical semantic integration

We will define semantic integration, explain why it is useful, differentiate it from other (non-semantic) techniques for integration and then go on to give a practical demonstration of semantic integration using easily available data sources, common semantic web tools and techniques, and showcase the usage of some of the Semantic Web based techniques for alignment and interoperability that have come out of ITA research in this area.  Our specific focus will be one integration of existing data sources and existing instance data, largely from small lightweight ontologies.  We will not be focusing on the more traditional "model based" alignment and mapping concerns that are usually associated with large scale ontologies although we will briefly mention these in order to contrast our approach.

Attendees should have a basic understanding of data integration or semantic integration concepts, and ideally a basic understand of Semantic Web technologies although this is not mandatory as we will be introducing these technologies at the beginning of the workshop.

Semantic integration is primarily of interest to researchers in the areas of distributed coalition planning and decision making, although semantic integration techniques are also relevant to issues in the sensor information processing and delivery domain and in some cases to security and policy management.   Semantic integration is a powerful and useful core component to be used when dealing with multiple disparate systems and distributed data in heterogeneous formats, situations that are commonplace to most ITA research concerns.

This workshop is comprised on a series of presentations introducing the domain,  showcasing example techniques and approaches, and will be concluded with a 30 minute discussion between the speakers, invited guests and attendees

Military Planning: concepts, process and tools
Organisers  Title Description

Jitu Patel

Maj Ed Gentle

David Mott

Military Planning: concepts, process and tools

Planning is one of the key military functions.  It is directed by the
commander and carried out by a core team of planners who are supported by
other staff officers.  The activity is carried out at all levels of command.
Though the outline planning process is common, the details differ between
levels of command as well as between services.  This session will provide an
introduction to military planning. The tutorial is divided into three parts:

1) overview of the military planning process  including a short exercise which will help students better understand the intricacies of the process.

2) an outline of extant planning support tools and their usefulness, lessons from recent operations, issues that need to be addressed.

3) an introduction to CPM (which addresses one of the key issues and is currently being research in P12), a demo of the CPM visualiser.  The session will end with a discussion of the way forward.

Network Services for Participatory Urban Sensing
Organisers  Title  Description

Mani Srivastava

Mario Gerla

Bolek Szymanski

Kin Leung

Kang-won Lee

Trevor Ellis (Transport for London (TfL))

Jon Crowcroft (Cambridge)
 


Urban Sensing

The aim of this workshop is to discuss challenges and present on-going research in network architecture and services for military operations and homeland defense applications in urban spaces. A traditional approach for such sensing is to instrument physical spaces with embedded sensors to monitor physical and human activities, which is often insufficient in uncertain urban sensing environments. Embedding sufficient sensing resources across neighborhoods and cities is simply too costly, requires broad deployments that are likely to be either aesthetically or politically unacceptable; and, ultimately prove to be inflexible in the face of diverse missions, unknown coverage requirements, and sensing uncertainties. An alternative vision of sensing in urban spaces has begun to emerge based on sensing by the public itself. Termed as Participatory Sensing, this entails exploiting for sensing the natural mobility of people through and between spaces they live, work, and commute in. Such a system can coordinate data capture by people using sensors embedded in their vehicles as well as cell phones that are already equipped with acoustic, image, and location sensors (and have Bluetooth interface to which external sensors can be connected). Cell phones can be valuable tools for people to contribute human intelligence as they provide text and graphics entry for the manual description and annotation of events observed by people during the course of their daily lives. Sensors embedded in vehicles offer complementary advantages of fewer constraints on the processing, sensing, and communication platform. This workshop will address recent research in participatory sensing in creating network services, models, and protocols for realizing this vision of turning the vehicles and cell phones in an urban space into a fluid substrate for hosting widespread but coordinated participatory sensing of urban spaces.
The workshop is structured as a set of plenary speakers followed by a panel. The talks by plenary speakers would collectively address the unique urban sensing requirements and opportunities in military and homeland defense applications, and descrive experience from urban sensing deployments. The panel would have short talks by various ITA researchers describing on-going research activities focusing on problems such as: identifying and coordinating vehicles and people for specific sensing tasks; passive (autonomous) vs. active (human coordinated) sensing; exploiting sensing and data sharing opportunities that present themselves as people and vehicles move around; optimization of sampling coverage while assuring credibility and quality of sensor data; sensor information storage, processing, sharing, and search optimized for disconnected operation and opportunistic mobility; mechanisms for incentivizing people to participate; and modeling of mobility, availability, social interactions, sensing performance, privacy constraints, and trustworthiness of people and vehicles.

 

Doctoral Symposium
Organisers  Title  Description

Diego Pizzocaro

Daniele Masato

Nikoletta Sofra

Konrad Borowiecki

David Emele Chukwuemeka

Chris Burnett

Hosam Rowaihy
Matthew P. Johnson


Doctoral Symposium

Workshop aim
The ITA Doctoral Symposium is intended to be an event specifically aimed at training and supporting PhD students involved in the ITA Project. The main goal is indeed to provide a forum for doctoral students to present their work and obtain guidance from experts as well as to help planning the future.

Event benefits
This event will benefit the ITA Project by encouraging collaborations across different technical areas and by laying the foundations for a community of students who will feel part of the same research environment. We also aim to help the sponsors to communicate to the students what their expectations are, so that students can identify the ways in which they can contribute the most to the Project.
Students that will register to the ITA Doctoral Symposium will be given the possibility to present a poster on their research. The posters may be shown during the entire length of the main conference, allowing the students to receive as much feedback on their work as possible.

Organization
The workshop will be divided into three main sessions:

1. First session (45 minutes): a keynote held by John Ibbotson, one of the relevant figures in the ITA. John Ibbotson is a Senior Member and Master Inventor at IBM UK, as well as Project Champion for Project 13. He is also pursuing a PhD at Southampton University (UK). As Project 13 Champion, he will give the students an overview of the Project, followed by some insight on his career in Industry and his PhD development.

2. Second session (60 minutes): a panel of three/four experts from Academia,Industry and the Military that will focus on the topic ‚"How to choose a careerpath?". Given the unique structure of the ITA, it will be possible to highlightthe differences between Academia, Industry and Government careers.Confirmed panelists at the moment are John Ibbotson, Tien Pham (Army Research Laboratory, US), Jon Crowcroft (University of Cambridge, UK) andMike Strub (Army Research Laboratory, US & Defense Science andTechnology Laboratory, UK):
 - Tien Pham is the Government Technical Area Leader for Technical Area 3,as well as a Project 7 collaborator.
 - Jon Crowcroft is a member of the Consortium Management Committee and he works within Technical Area 1.
 - Mike Strub is Government Technical Area Leader (together with Jitu Patel) for Technical Area 4 as well as a Project 10 collaborator.

The panel discussion could start with a brief introduction from the panelists about their role within the Project and the institution they work for. To follow,the discussion would touch on topics as what makes such institution/role stimulating, and and what is its impact on the field, or on science. Other interesting subjects may be what skills and abilities a student would requireto pursue a career in the field/institution in which the panelists are involved and how easy would be to get an interview. Also, what are the expectationsof the institution from its employee and what gratifications could a candidate benefit of by working in that particular field.

3. Third session (90 minutes): a set of 6 talks (15 minutes each) given by PhD students in which they will present an overview of their research work.  Presenters will be able to receive feedback from their peers and from the expert panel; at the same time the student audience will understand the methodologies and approaches used by their peers facing the typical challenges of pursuing a PhD (e.g. formulating working hypothesis, doing literature review, evaluating results, etc.).

The attendance to the Doctoral Symposium is FREE for all ITA PhD Students,on the condition that it must be the only workshop they are attending. Payment of the workshop fee is required if students plan to attend any other workshop on thesame day.

Demos (Sherfield Building)

Title

Leader

Inter-domain routing for MANETs Kang-Won Lee, IBM US
ITA Integrative 'Fabric and GaianDB enabled sensor network David Vyvyan, IBM UK
Quality of Information an Empirical Approach Laurence Hey, Imperial College
End-to-End Sensor-Mission Assignment Alun Preece, Cardiff
Coalition Security Policy Manager Portal Clare-Marie Karat, IBM US
Scenarios Experiments and Context Models using BattleField2 Helen Bowyer, IBM UK
Policy-Based management in Dynamic Communities Anandha Gopalan, Imperial College
Semantic Integration in the Holistan vignette Dave Braines, IBM UK
Automatic Transformation of IPSEC Security Policies to Device Configurations Kirk Schloegel, Honeywell
Innovation discussion (Sherfield Building)
Tuesday 19:30 - 21:00

The End of the Endless Frontier?  Innovation and Transition in the 21st Century

 

Full details for this Innovation discussion can be found here

Panelists

Jim Hendler, Tetherless World Senior Constellation Chair, Rensselaer polytechnic Institute (moderator)

Mark Wegman, Head of Computer Science, IBM Research

John Parmentola, Director for Research and Laboratory Management, US Army

David Gann, Chair in Technology and Innovation Management, Imperial

Nigel Chew, Deputy Director Defence Technology and Innovation Centre, MoD

 
AttachmentSize
final programme.jpg95.99 KB
ACITAProgramme.pdf1.4 MB